Winyard AI

Call Website Contact the business

Winyard AI Winyard AI helps small businesses save time with practical AI & automation solutions.

Founded by Tony Winyard, we eliminate tedious tasks so you can focus on growth.

Someone posted a cropped Monet online, captioned it "AI-generated," and watched a crowd of strangers confidently tear ap...
04/06/2026

Someone posted a cropped Monet online, captioned it "AI-generated," and watched a crowd of strangers confidently tear apart one of the most admired paintings ever made, calling it lifeless, emotionless, "AI slop." Nobody had actually looked. They were reviewing the label, not the art. In my latest article I use that small prank, plus a confession about the 30,000 records I bought as a kid and why I'll happily never touch vinyl again, to make a case some people will find heresy: a good song is a good song whoever or whatever made it, and the same is now true of the proposal that wins the client or the report that lands. As fakes and "AI slop" labels flood everything, the rare skill isn't reflexive hostility to the word AI. It's taste. The ability to tell what is actually good from what only looks the part. Have a read, and tell me whether you think I'm right or hopelessly outnumbered.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/never-vinyl-tony-winyard-6fhde

"Which automation tool should I use?"I get this question at least twice a week. And the honest answer is: it depends on ...
19/02/2026

"Which automation tool should I use?"

I get this question at least twice a week. And the honest answer is: it depends on how your brain works.

I've built workflows on all three of the main platforms (Zapier, Make, and n8n), and they're all capable tools. But they suit different people, different budgets, and different levels of complexity.

Quick version:

Zapier is the easiest to learn. If you think in steps ("when this happens, do that, then do this"), you'll pick it up in an afternoon. The catch is pricing. Zapier charges per task, and a five-step workflow counts as five tasks every time it runs. That adds up fast. A client of mine was spending £70/month on a single lead pipeline that we rebuilt on Make for about £6.

Make thinks in flowcharts rather than to-do lists. If your workflow needs to branch ("if UK lead, do this; if international, do that"), Make handles it beautifully and cheaply. The learning curve is steeper, but for anyone who's ever drawn a process diagram, it clicks quickly.

n8n is the developer's choice. Open source, self-hostable, and the most flexible of the three. If you're comfortable with webhooks and JSON, the ceiling is highest here. If those words mean nothing to you, start with Make or Zapier.

The platform genuinely matters less than most people think. What matters is understanding your process before you automate it. I've seen expensive Zapier setups that work perfectly and cheap n8n builds that are a mess, and the reverse.

Full comparison with pricing breakdowns and a simple decision flowchart on the blog.

# # Link

https://tonywinyard.com/blog/make-vs-zapier-vs-n8n

I built my entire portfolio site in a single sitting using an AI coding tool called Claude Code. Next.js, TypeScript, Ta...
17/02/2026

I built my entire portfolio site in a single sitting using an AI coding tool called Claude Code. Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind, Framer Motion. Every component written from scratch, responsive, deployed.

Sounds impressive. Except the first version was terrible.

Blue-to-purple gradient. Generic tech icons. Copy that read like every AI consultant's website you've ever forgotten. I looked at it and thought, "Well, that's technically a website."

So I scrapped it. Went back to my planning documents, rewrote the brief with actual specifics (warmer colour palette, real personality in the copy, design that reflected me rather than my toolchain), and ran it again.

Version 2 shipped.

The lesson I keep learning, and keep seeing with the businesses I consult with: AI tools are only as good as the thinking you put in front of them. A vague brief produces vague output. A detailed brief produces something genuinely useful.

Thirty minutes writing a clear requirements doc saved me three hours of back-and-forth.

Full write-up on the blog with the actual planning approach, what worked, and what I'd do differently.

# # Link

https://tonywinyard.com/blog/how-i-built-this-site

I had a conversation with a business owner last month who spends every Monday morning reformatting the same spreadsheet....
16/02/2026

I had a conversation with a business owner last month who spends every Monday morning reformatting the same spreadsheet. Two hours, every week, copying data from one system into another.

When I showed him how to automate that in about ten minutes, he just stared at the screen. "That's it?"

That's the thing about AI in business. It's not the dramatic, headline-grabbing stuff that makes the biggest difference. It's the boring bits. The repetitive tasks your best people are wasting time on.

AI replaces tasks, not roles. Drafting first versions. Transforming data. Summarising meetings. Spotting patterns in customer feedback. These are tasks within jobs, not jobs themselves.

The real competitive question isn't "will AI replace us?" It's "what happens when our competitors start using it and we don't?"

I wrote a full piece about where AI genuinely helps, where it falls short (it hallucinates, it needs supervision, it can't replace real expertise), and how to think about it practically.

Worth a read if you've been wondering where to start.

# # Link

https://tonywinyard.com/blog/ai-wont-replace-you

Most people use AI the same way they used Google.Question in. Answer out. Done.Feels productive. You got an answer. Task...
05/02/2026

Most people use AI the same way they used Google.

Question in. Answer out. Done.

Feels productive. You got an answer. Task complete.

But Roger Martin makes an uncomfortable point: AI is fundamentally a mode-seeking device. It searches through vast amounts of data and returns the most frequent answer to your question. Not necessarily the best answer. The most common one.

Ask for something innovative and you get the most popular "innovative" response.

For factual queries, that's fine. For strategic decisions, creative work, or anything where your specific context matters? The average answer produces average results. By design.

The subtler trap: even experienced users are still optimising for answers rather than thinking.

There's a difference between "help me solve this" and "help me think about this." The first outsources your cognition. The second develops it.

Research from 2024 found significant negative correlation between frequent AI usage and critical thinking abilities. Same pattern we saw with GPS users and spatial memory. Use it or lose it applies to thinking, not just muscles.

The alternative: use AI as a thinking partner, not an answer engine.

Instead of asking for answers, try asking for questions:

"Before answering, ask me 3 questions to understand my situation better"
"Challenge my assumptions here"
"What am I not considering?"

I've configured my AI tools to default to questioning mode. Before answering strategic questions, they now ask: "Do you want me to help you think it through, or just give you my best answer?"

The capability AI can't replace is your capacity to think well about questions that don't have answers yet.

Wrote about the research and practical implementation in more detail on the blog. Link in comments.

Ever typed something into ChatGPT or Claude, hoped for the best, and got back something that could have been written by ...
05/02/2026

Ever typed something into ChatGPT or Claude, hoped for the best, and got back something that could have been written by anyone, about anything, for no one in particular?

Generic. Vague. The verbal equivalent of beige.

You're not alone. Most people blame the AI.

The real issue: when AI gives you useless output, it's because you didn't give it enough to work with.

Think of it like hiring a consultant. Would you rather have:

A genius who knows nothing about your business, or
Someone sharp who understands your customers, your constraints, and why the obvious solution won't work?

You'd pick the second one. Every time. Same applies to AI.

I've written up what actually works: the four layers of context that turn generic AI output into something you'd actually use.

Read the full post here: https://www.tonywinyard.com/blog/context-is-the-whole-game

Eight months of building. Nothing to show for it.That's how it felt, anyway.I've been using Claude Code almost daily. Bu...
26/01/2026

Eight months of building. Nothing to show for it.
That's how it felt, anyway.

I've been using Claude Code almost daily. Building utilities. Websites. Automation workflows. Apps that solve problems I kept running into.
But none of it was public. No portfolio. No evidence. Just scattered files on my hard drive and a vague sense that I should probably document this stuff.

I was stuck in consumption mode. Reading about AI. Watching tutorials. Learning, learning, learning. But not showing.

So I built a portfolio site this morning. Six hours. Everything in one place.
It's at tonywinyard.com.
Screenshots are live. Demos coming soon.

I'm going to start documenting my learning publicly from here. Not as an expert (I'm not). Just as someone figuring things out and showing the work.

If that's useful to you, follow along. If you're stuck in the same consumption trap, maybe this is the nudge.

I build smart little AI tools that solve overlooked problems, tools that save you time, simplify your work, or just make...
09/09/2025

I build smart little AI tools that solve overlooked problems, tools that save you time, simplify your work, or just make life easier.
From image workflows to micro-tutors, every app has one job: make things smoother.

If you could design the perfect tutor, what would it do differently from a teacher, a course, or YouTube?That’s the exac...
04/09/2025

If you could design the perfect tutor, what would it do differently from a teacher, a course, or YouTube?

That’s the exact challenge I’m tackling with MasteryTrack. It’s not just another e-learning platform. It’s designed to function as the world’s most adaptable personal tutor, available to anyone learning any subject.

Here’s how it works:

Always in the Goldilocks Zone: Never too easy, never too hard. MasteryTrack constantly recalibrates based on your performance.

Finds & Fixes Gaps: Struggling with a new concept? It traces back through prerequisites until it finds the gap, patches it, and rebuilds your understanding.

Dynamic Skill Graphs: Think of it as a living map of your knowledge — every topic linked to others, with progress visualised as you advance.

Cross-Subject Learning: Want to learn statistics with psychology examples? Or literature explained through historical context? MasteryTrack builds those bridges.

Tutor Personas: Not everyone learns the same way. Choose from a Socratic guide, a coach, a no-nonsense instructor, or even a humorous mentor.

Motivation Layer: Skill trees that grow as you learn, progress streaks, achievement badges, even micro-credentials you can share on LinkedIn.

Educator & Parent Tools: Dashboards showing mastery, weak spots, and alerts before students fall behind.

Accessibility & Inclusivity: Dyslexia-friendly fonts, offline study packs, speech and handwriting input, full screen reader support.

This isn’t just for kids in school. It’s for:

Secondary and university students preparing for big exams.

Adults retraining for new careers.

Parents and teachers who want clear insight into student progress.

Anyone who loves learning but wants a structured partner in the journey.

💡 In short: MasteryTrack is built to be the tutor that never gets tired, never loses patience, and always knows the next best step for you.

Community Prompt:
What’s the biggest frustration you’ve had with learning - lack of motivation, bad feedback, or just not knowing where to start?

Photographers/content folks: if you could design a one-click export preset, what would it include?I’ve just pushed a big...
02/09/2025

Photographers/content folks: if you could design a one-click export preset, what would it include?

I’ve just pushed a big update to PixelScribe based on community requests:
• Project Setup Wizard for brand-aware alt text + filenames
• Per-folder overrides (so blog images ≠ client previews)
• Pro exports (JPEG/WebP/PNG, quality sliders, resize by longest/shortest edge)
• Token-based naming + global prefixes/suffixes
• Built-in watermarking (logo position/opacity/size)
• IPTC/EXIF preservation
• AI-powered crop suggestions (16:9, 1:1, etc.)
• Save & load presets

What’s the must-have combo you’d want to trigger with a single click? And what would stop you adopting this today?

Address

Haverfordwest
RG270RF

Opening Hours

Monday 10am - 7pm
Tuesday 10am - 7pm
Wednesday 10am - 7pm
Thursday 10am - 7pm
Friday 10am - 7pm

Telephone

+447771894560

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Winyard AI posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Winyard AI:

Shortcuts

Share

Category