NuCoat

NuCoat is a woman-owned business founded by the original inventor of Digital Transfer Paper and owner of 70+ patents including Direct to Film (DTF) printing.

Join the NuCoat and experience the power of DTF printing! NuCoat specializes in formulating, manufacturing and distributing a wide variety of print & paper technologies. Explore our specialized offerings: cutting-edge heat transfers, high-quality dye sublimation papers, specialized papers tailored for artistic and creative applications. With a rich legacy of innovation, NuCoat is a leading provide

r of specialty papers, films and technologies. Since 1996 we have been continuously formulating and manufacturing market ready products and technologies. Nucoat is more than just a workplace, or a supplier; we are a team of A players that shares a drive and entrepreneurial spirit who dedicate the workday to going above and beyond. We’ve pooled our resources, knowledge and experience to turn our dreams into reality. With this united team, we’ll grow beyond what we could have ever envisioned, revolutionizing the printing industry with groundbreaking technologies and supporting our customers in their success as well.

06/11/2026

A peer-to-peer note for anyone managing licensed-apparel programs.

We're 28 days from the CPSC eFiling mandate (July 8). I've spent the last few weeks listening to brand-protection and licensing leads talk about it, and most of the candid conversation is the same: *which of my licensees are ready, which aren't, and how do I tell the difference without an audit?*

You can tell the difference in one email. Three questions, sent to each licensee program manager this week:

1. Can you produce the GCC (and CPC, for children's product) for the decorated goods you're shipping in our program — today?

2. Can you send the SDS and a third-party test record for the inks, films, and powders running through your decorator?

3. Who is your records custodian if a regulator or our retailer asks?

The reply tells you everything. Three confident "yes" answers with attachments inside the same business day = a program that's ready. A "let me get back to you" on any of the three = a program that needs a vendor-reply window before July 8. A "we're fully compliant, don't worry" with no attachments = the answer that doesn't survive a regulator inquiry.

The mandate isn't a chemistry overhaul — it's a documentation question, and the question answers cleanly for the licensees who have done the work. Inside 28 days, your job as a brand-side lead is to find out who has and who hasn't, and to give the "hasn't" group a runway to close the gap before the goods on July 8 invoices become your conversation.

NuCoat's Grand Slam Compliance Framework: https://lnkd.in/gDmvGjaM

06/10/2026

Your name is on this.

Is the documentation?

The CPSC eFiling mandate on July 8 makes the records custodian for decorated goods an explicit, identifiable party. Where the licensee agreement is silent, the assumption defaults to the brand on the label.

Four documents and a named custodian close the gap:
→ GCC
→ CPC (children's product)
→ SDS for inks, films, powders
→ Third-party test record

Check out how you can become compliant: https://nucoatinc.com/pages/grand-slam

06/04/2026

34 days to CPSC eFiling.

Here's the single most useful thing you can do this week. Call (or email) your ink, film, and powder suppliers and ask one question:

"When I order, does the documentation ship with the product — GCC, CPC for kids' goods, SDS, and a third-party test record — and who's the records custodian if my customer's broker asks?"

Your answer tells you everything about whether your consumable side is a documentation asset or a documentation gap.

Ask the question this week.

For the framework in one place: nucoatinc.com/pages/grand-slam

06/03/2026

35 days to CPSC eFiling.

This is the whole ask, on one card. ⤵️

When the mandate touches your shop, it won't arrive as a CPSC bulletin — it'll arrive as a customer's email asking for these:

✅ GCC — General Certificate of Conformity
✅ CPC — for children's product
✅ SDS — for the inks, films, powders you run
✅ Third-party test record — the paper *under* the label claim
✅ One named records custodian — who can produce the file

Four documents and a custodian. That's it. Not lot-chain claims. Not patents. Not a chemistry project.

The only question worth answering this week: *for the consumables actually running in your shop, can you produce this list right now — from your own files?*

If yes, you're ahead of most. If no, you just found your gap with five weeks of runway instead of on July 9.

LINK IN BIO | Grand Slam Compliance Framework.

05/29/2026

40 days to CPSC eFiling.

This is what proof looks like at the partner tier ⤵️

Documented. GCC, CPC where applicable, SDS, third-party test record, identified records custodian — shipping with the consumable.

Consolidated. One closed-system stack. One records custodian. One row on the customer's vendor master.

Validated. Broker is running 16 CFR 1110 six-data-element entries through ACE today, in the CPSC voluntary stage.

LINK IN BIO. Grand Slam Compliance Framework.

05/28/2026

42 days to CPSC eFiling.

If you run DTF on imported decorated, licensed, or kids' apparel, the program your OEM or your distribution partner walked into your shop with should already be doing three things for you right now.

If it isn't, that's a question worth asking your partner this week — not in July.

1. Documentation should ship with the consumable.
GCC, CPC where applicable, SDS, third-party test record, and a named records custodian — landing with the order, not three days later, not on the next order. If you are still emailing your ink or film supplier asking for the SDS, the program in your shop isn't producing the documentation it should be.

2. The consumable side of your vendor list should be small and named.
If your ink is from one vendor, your film from another, your powder from a third, your cleaners from a fourth, and nobody owns the documentation across that surface — you have a multi-vendor problem your customer's compliance team is going to surface in 42 days. A documented closed-system stack collapses that to one row on the vendor list with one named records custodian.

3. Your customers' broker should already be running it.
The CPSC voluntary stage is live. Brokers who are operating under the PGA Message Set are running 16 CFR 1110 six-data-element entries through ACE today. If your end-customer's broker has not validated the documented side yet, that is the call to make this month, not next month.

The mandate hits July 8 and the rule is the rule — but the partners doing the work right are already producing the proof. If your Catalyst partner / OEM / distributor isn't, that's the conversation.

For the framework in one place: nucoatinc.com/pages/grand-slam

05/27/2026

42 days to CPSC eFiling.

This is the picture Catalyst partners are putting on the customer brief this week. ⤵️

Before
the consumable side of a typical customer's vendor master: 4–7 inputs, documentation living across that many portals plus a shared drive of unversioned PDFs.

After
one closed-system stack. One identified records custodian. One row.

Same volume. Same SKUs. Same product. *Consolidated* documentation surface.

Not "only safe choice." Not patents. Just documentation-by-default, in writing. GCC, CPC where applicable, SDS, third-party test record, identified records custodian — shipping with the consumable.

LINK IN BIO. → Grand Slam Compliance Framework.

05/21/2026

The retail buyer programs we work with are writing the next round of vendor specs this month — 49 days out from the CPSC eFiling rule on July 8. Three things are showing up in the new language that decorator shops are going to want to read carefully:

1. The four documents at the consumable tier

2. "Documentation ships with product." Verbatim, in some agreements. Not "available on request." Not "we'll send it on the next order." It ships with the order.

3. A single place where the documentation lives. Retail compliance teams are tired of chasing PDFs across twenty portals.

None of this is alarmism. The rule is real, the date is fixed, and the better suppliers in the category have been ready for it for a while. The shops that have been running on documented consumables for the last year or two are in a different position than the shops still sorting it out.

If your consumable supplier already ships GCC, CPC, SDS, third-party tested, with a named records custodian — you are most of the way there. That is the standard your brand and retail customers are now writing into their specs.

If you are still sorting it, this is the month to do it!

05/20/2026

49 days to CPSC eFiling.

Most retail compliance programs already have the four documents somewhere. The question for July 8 isn't whether the documents exist. It's whether they live on one surface, in one data model — or scattered across twenty vendor portals, three shared drives, and an email thread from last quarter.

The retail programs writing for July 8 look like this:

Consumable input → four documents (GCC · CPC · SDS · Test Record · Custodian) → SKU → certificate → records custodian. One surface. One data model. Multi-vendor.

Not twenty portals. Not a folder of PDFs.

The work of building that surface is May / June work — not July work.

NuCoat's Grand Slam Compliance Framework: link in bio

Address

13055 15th Avenue N
Minneapolis, MN
55441

Website

https://nucoatinc.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when NuCoat posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to NuCoat:

Shortcuts

Want your business to be the top-listed Engineering Company in Minneapolis?