04/14/2021
The question of "what-if" has been the subject of everlasting discussion regarding the mitigation efforts for the COVID-19 pandemic. Was the lockdown too weak? What if we had acted earlier and with more severity? Would the economy have fared worse if we were stricter?
The answers to many of these questions can be found through new quantitative research supported by the ANR. These scientists implemented an SEIR model to find the optimal approach measured by tradeoff between gross domestic product (GDP) and total number of infected people over a given time period using data collected from France.
The optimal 4-phase strategy was found with an initial lockdown duration between 53 and 83 days that could have divided the total number of infections by 6 and reduced the economic loss by over $10 billion. The model shows that the initial lockdown should have been shorter but more severe with adjustment phases implemented earlier than they had been.
Hindsight is always 20/20, but will insights from this quantitatively backed optimal mitigation strategy be taken into consideration for the next health crisis?
To learn more about this research, click on the link below!
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.06169.pdf