Dinkum energy

Dinkum energy dinkum energy is an alternative energy consulting company. Expertise includes the specific areas of The planet is suffering. You want to cut your power bill.

Climate change, overfishing, pollution, over population, peak oil are all key challenges for our generation. As a single company, we cannot solve all of the world’s problems however we can help address the potential energy shortage the world faces. Alternative energy solutions include renewable energy and low carbon intensive technology. We can provide customised solutions for homes, commerce and

industry; in addition, reducing the overall use of energy, not only assists in saving energy resources, but also reduces running costs. You are concerned about climate change and you want to do your bit. Solar power is now the most logical and economical solution for home owners to address both of these. But, with are so many options and so many potential pitfalls, where do you start? I would like to suggest that right here is the place to be. dinkum energy now has over 15 years of experience of experience in alternative energy solutions. Adrian Horin, the proprietor, has an Advanced Diploma in Renewable Energy Technology and is a qualified designer of alternative energy solutions in his own right. After years in the field consulting to large corporations, government and home owners, Adrian has developed an application to calculate the potential savings that can be made from a solar power installation. This application takes into account:
- Azimuth (how far off true north)
- Roof pitch
- Power costs and price increases
- Feed in tariffs (per energy retailer)
- System size
- System degradation
- Energy usage patterns (day light use of power)
- Possible power output is computed as well as the expected savings per year, quarter and per month. - The break even point in years is calculated where the savings from the system meets the cost of the system. Advice on which panels and inverters is also provided. Panels
When deciding on what panels to purchase, the following factors should be considered:
- Available north facing roof space.
- Shade that may affect the panels.
- The temperature extremes the panels will be exposed to
- The amount of salt air.
- The quality of the components used to manufacture the panels especially:
- silicon - is it tier one, 2, 3, or 4? Tier 1 silicon will not degrade as quickly as the lower tiers.
- the glass - 3.2mm tempered glass should be the least that is used in Australia. Some panels are still using 2mm plate glass, typically panels sold into Asian markets. This glass would not withstand the pressure from a descent hail storm.
- The frame - is it marine grade? Salty air in Australia can cause enormous levels of corrosion if the incorrect metal is used.
- Is the design mono-crystalline, poly-crystalline or thin film? There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these.
- The physical size of the panel as well as the kW rating of the panel.
- The efficiency of the panel.
- The temperature co-efficiency (power) of the panel is also important in a hot climate. Some panels really should not be sold in Queensland for example because their handling of heat is just not up to scratch. This efficiency rating, which is on every specification sheet, tells us what percentage output will drop by for every 1 degree Centigrade that the cell temperature is above 25 degrees. In some locations, the cell temperature on a panel in Summer can hit up to 90 degrees. Recommendations:
- Sunpower (unquestionably the best)
- Canadian Solar
- Trina

Inverters
This component is probably more important than the panels because the inverter is the inverter is more likely to fail if you purchase badly. So, where do you start? Unfortunately, unlike when buying a car or perhaps an electrical appliance, the brand names in this category will most likely be unknown to you (as with most brands of panels). This is where the experience of your provider is all important. If you are lucky enough to find an honest and knowledgeable sales person (yes, they do exist), they should be able to guide you well. There are many features on the better inverters but, to keep it basic, an inverter converts DC power to AC power. They can be broken down into a few main categories, string inverters (usually installed on a wall) and micro-inverters (installed on the roof under the panels). String inverters are the most commonly used in Australia although micro inverters are gaining in popularity. String inverters can either have a transformer or be transformer less (referred to as TL). They can have a single maximum power point tracker or dual MPPT (the dual can handle handles facing two different directions). Micro inverters can be DC to AC or DC to DC (sometimes referred to as DC optimisers). OK, if you weren't confused before you started reading, you probably are now. I do not propose to go into the benefits / features of each type here. But I will list some of the potential problems that could occur if you make a bad choice:
- High failure rate. Some inverters sold here in Australia have had failure rates as high as 30%. -These failures can be caused by numerous factors aside from just poor quality of manufacturer:
- Salt air.
- Dust.
- Geckos.
- Overheating.
- Poor air circulation.
- Poor efficiency - output suffers.
- LCD panels fade in the light.
- Lack of local support from either the reseller or the manufacturer.
- Poor communication options.
- Inability to be export limited (now required by some electrical wholesalers).
- Incorrect voltage range to support the panels installed. Recommendations:
- Fronius
- SMA

The strongest recommendation that I can make, if you are lucky enough to live in Queensland, is to call Adrian Horin on 0400715799 for a personal, free of charge, on site consultation.

This could be a game changer in the take up of hydrogen fuel cells
10/11/2022

This could be a game changer in the take up of hydrogen fuel cells

KU Leuven researchers have developed rooftop panels that capture both solar power and water from the air. Like traditional PV modules, hydrogen panels are also connected, but via gas tubes instead of electric cables. The researchers are now preparing to bring the tech to the mass market via a spinof...

Green vs blue hydrogen.
10/11/2022

Green vs blue hydrogen.

The claim it would take 25% of Australia’s land mass to provide the planet with green hydrogen misses an obvious point

28/10/2021

The Australian Government has claimed that they have a plan to obtain net zero carbon by 2050. The plan includes using carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) and 'clean' hydrogen. I have grave concerns about both of these.

CCS
This process involves capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) either from the atmosphere or from the exhaust produced from industrial processes and then injecting it into the ground. My understanding is that 'the plan' refers to capturing the CO2 produced mainly from the fossil fuel industry as this is where the most production occurs. Does the plan allow for the fact that most industries that produce CO2 exhaust do not actually produce enough in their own right to be viable to pay for the capture and transport bill?

So, capturing the CO2 from the exhaust created burning coal at a coal fired power station for example would involve technology that will somehow filter and then capture the CO2 before it enters the atmosphere. The cost of adding the 'filtration' system is prohibitive and the technology is not yet proven.

So, let us just assume that I am incorrect, and the technology is available, economical and can produce 'clean' CO2, the next step is to transport the CO2 to the site where it is to be sequestered. It would be logical not to use even more fossil fuels for this purpose, but it is unlikely that the Australian Government has considered this in their plan.

Next, there needs to be available sites for sequestration and sites that have enough storage capacity for the huge amounts of CO2 that is produced by Australian industry. These sites, aside from needing to be huge and geographically distributed for economical reasons, also need to be safe. CO2 is poisonous. If it is injected into the ground, and at high pressure, what is the guarantee that the gas will not find its way back to the surface? Every single site needs to be safely secured, not just for the sequestration process, but for as long as it takes for the CO2 to be assimilated permanently into the soil. Does 'the plan' require these safety measures? Please note that the very few CCS trial sites have NOT been without issues in this area of safety.

It is also worth considering whether a feed of non-purified CO2 from the coal stacks is injected into the soil. The toxic substances could and most likely will have a permanent effect on the environment.

As a side note, there is a massive amount of furtive emissions of methane as a part of the mining of natural gas. This methane gas is 21 times (at least) worse than CO2 in its effect on climate temperatures. I hope that the final ‘plan’, when we see it, addresses this issue also.

Clean Hydrogen
As I understand from the media coverage of the plan, the Australian Government is planning to use clean hydrogen to somehow reduce CO2 emissions. So, what is clean hydrogen? Under the definition apparently used, it is any hydrogen irrelevant of the production process used. It is clean because when hydrogen is combusted, the exhaust is water vapour. This is certainly so much better than the polluting particulates produced by burning fossil fuels.

OK. Now let us look at how 'clean hydrogen' is made. Yes, hydrogen is the most abundant atom in our universe. The problem is that this atom is not so readily accessible on earth in its raw form. Hydrogen readily attaches to other atoms, e.g. oxygen to produce water and carbon to produce methane. This is where the difference arises between “Blue hydrogen” and “Green hydrogen”. Blue is where hydrogen is separated from the carbon in methane (natural gas); green is where hydrogen is separated from oxygen in water using electrolysis (using renewable energy for power). So, cynically speaking, which do you think is the preferred option of the Australian Government? My bet is using methane. If so, the fossil fuel industry will be very happy. Unfortunately, this Blue hydrogen will not reduce carbon emissions, if only because CO2 will still be released in its production. In addition, it gives the fossil fuel industry more reasons to keep mining.

So, tonight the Australian Prime Minister goes to Glasgow to the COP26 conference to brag about how Australian technology will reduce our CO2 emissions. I am guessing that there will be no discussion about transition from coal, oil and gas. There will be no promises in relation to moving to electric vehicles and subsidising battery technology.

I call this smoke and mirrors. Unfortunately, the alternative Government is not looking much better. The Australian Labor party has stated that they will not be closing down the fossil fuel industry. I can only hope that international condemnation will go some way to changing the current dirty path that Australia is on.

Maybe there is hope yet for the Australian automotive industry.
20/06/2020

Maybe there is hope yet for the Australian automotive industry.

The hydrogen fuel cell car is not dead yet; indeed, a new Australian company has just launched, promising to build industrial vehicles and passenger cars using fuel cell/ultracapacitor hybrid electric powertrains, with a "Snowy" SUV coming in 2022/3.

I really like this summary
07/06/2020

I really like this summary

30/05/2020

There are various forms of renewable energy. This means energy that does not run out. Examples of renewable energy are solar power, including photovoltaic (electricity from light), solar thermal (energy from solar heat), wind power (generators turned by wind), hydro electricity and micro hydro (generators turned by the force of water, tidal power (generators turned by the tide) and wave energy. I addition, the production of energy storage can use renewable energy i.e. batteries, molten salt (the heat can turn turbines), renewable hydrogen (can be used in high efficiency fuel cells to produce power).

All of these forms of production or storage are renewable unlike that produced by the use of fossil fuels. They will eventually run out or become too expensive to access. In addition, renewables are already the cheapest way to produce new power plants, including nuclear options.

There is a suggestion by some, that the embedded energy by fossil fuels in the main, in renewables (i.e. the metal used, concrete and other materials) more than negate any savings in 'carbon savings'. This has been proven incorrect in a number of scientific and economic studies (and, no, I cannot cite them now but they are out there).

I am writing this because the Australian Government, under the cover of the COVID-19 pandemic, is activating a plan to mine yet more fossil fuels, in this case, natural gas. Firstly, the mining of natural gas releases massive amounts of carbon dioxide. The burning of it releases even more. The use of it is more expensive than accessing the free power provided by the sun, wind or other forms of renewable energy. So, why would the Australian Government, via their COVID-19 Commission stacked with captains of the fossil fuel industry, go down this path? It does not make sense for either economic or definitely environmental reasons. Looking at potential motives outside of the 'captains', how much money is paid by the fossil fuel industry to political parties (not just the coalition)?

OK, perhaps it is because of the export income. Perhaps, instead, it is time to look at changing our focus to selling renewable power or storage options. We could even look at building a manufacturing industry to build renewable energy systems or storage devices. Another option is to build hydrogen fuel cells. This can be for stationary power or mobile power )cars, buses, trucks, light rail, trains. Would it not be a good thing to start manufacturing in Australia again?

I would like to see light rail and trains next but this is promising. I hope that it lasts longer than the Western Austr...
23/05/2020

I would like to see light rail and trains next but this is promising. I hope that it lasts longer than the Western Australian hydrogen bus trial.

100 hydrogen buses on Australian roads. It's the target, at least for Phase 1, of the just established H2OzBus Project, which has the goal of exploring delivery of innovative and sustainable transport solutions in the country. Public transport operator Transit Systems group has announced it is joini...

Great development in green hydrogen production!
19/02/2020

Great development in green hydrogen production!

Australian scientists claim they've worked out a much cheaper, more efficient way to split hydrogen out of water, using easily sourced iron and nickel catalysts instead of expensive, rare ruthenium, platinum and iridium catalysts favored by current large-scale hydrogen producers, which are…

Looking forward to hearing that similar plans are in place for the Australian train networks.
27/01/2020

Looking forward to hearing that similar plans are in place for the Australian train networks.

KRRI will unveil their next-generation hydrogen-powered electric trains using the latest Horizon PEM Fuel Cell systems. Seoul, Korea— The Korean Railroad Research Institute (KRRI) will use 400kW PEM Fuel Cell...

This is a sensible trial for hydrogen energy. I am looking forward to many more.
21/01/2020

This is a sensible trial for hydrogen energy. I am looking forward to many more.

A trial in which homes in the small WA tourist town will be powered by hydrogen micro grids could be extended across the state if successful.

Address

39 Bunya Court
Hervey Bay, QLD
4655

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dinkum energy posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Dinkum energy:

Share

Category