01/09/2026
If you’ve ever watched the trends across a flotation bank, you may have seen this behaviour:
One cell starts oscillating. The next responds. Before long, level variability is propagating through the circuit. 🌊
The natural response may be to re-tune the individual PID loops.
But what if the problem isn’t the tuning of any single controller?
Flotation cells operate as an interconnected process.
Changes in one part of the bank can influence conditions downstream, meaning that independently tuned level controllers may not always be enough to achieve stable performance across the entire circuit.
During a recent optimisation project at a mineral processing facility, we approached the problem from the process first.
🛠️ Our approach:
1. Understand the interactions
We analysed how level and control actions were propagating between cells rather than assessing each loop independently.
2. Develop a coordinated control strategy
We designed a decoupling approach to reduce the impact of upstream disturbances on downstream level control.
3. Implement within the existing DCS
The strategy was incorporated into the site's existing control architecture, coordinating control actions across the circuit without requiring a new control platform.
🏆 The outcome:
• Reduced level oscillations across the flotation circuit.
• More stable operating conditions.
• Reduced reliance on manual intervention.
• Improved ability to operate the circuit in automatic control.
The lesson went beyond PID tuning.
Sometimes the individual loops aren't the real problem. It's the interaction between them.
Understanding those process interactions before changing the control strategy can reveal opportunities to improve performance using the systems already installed.
Is your flotation circuit being controlled as a collection of individual loops or as an interconnected process?
Think Improvement, Think Key. ⚙️
👉 www.keyengineering.com.au