BJV Design Inc.

Name: BJV Design Inc.
Address: Calgary, AB, T3H4Z9, CA
Telephone: +14038802347
Price range: Not applicable

Home
Canada
Calgary, AB
BJV Design Inc.

BJV is a geophysical consulting company that specializes is seismic acquisition design.

We have extensive worldwide experience in designing 2D, 3D, 4D, 3C, and VSP seismic programs

09/03/2026

Some people feel that designing a seismic program involves one main step which is to:
1. Determine the parameters that provide optimal geophysical imaging. This is done through an analysis to establish the ideal sampling, trace density and far offsets based on the earth’s response.

While this is a critical first step in Seismic Survey Design, the truth is that there are two additional steps that are often ignored:
2. Adjust the parameters to optimize for the economic objectives. Do the optimal geophysical parameters reach or exceed the economic objectives?
3. Adjust parameters to optimize for operational efficiency while minimizing environmental impact. This means achieving imaging objectives in the most cost-effective way possible.

09/01/2026

A new month, a new page, a new chapter. Happy September!

08/28/2026

Did you know that seismic is often used for Archaeological purposes? Using seismic to identify buried structures beneath the surface helps researchers understand the past as well help determine where excavations should (or should not) be done. A great example is the numerous 3D seismic programs we designed for the History Channel’s Curse of Oak Island TV show.

Always make sure your seismic program is properly designed with your specific objectives in mind.
Talk to BJV the next time you are looking to acquire seismic for any form of archaeology.

08/27/2026

Did you know that seismic is often used for Mineral Resource Extraction? Seismic is a valuable tool in determining the economic viability of subsurface minerals in advance of commencing the mining process. Seismic can be used to identify many types of mineable resources including:
Potash
Gold
Uranium
Brine
Helium

Always make sure your seismic program is properly designed with your specific objectives in mind.
Talk to BJV the next time you are looking to acquire seismic for any form of mineral exploration.

08/26/2026

Did you know that seismic can be used for Emissions Storage? Seismic is very valuable in determining economic and geological viability, as well as to identify safe locations to store emissions in the subsurface. Seismic is also an important element in the long term monitoring of the subsurface reservoirs, often in the form of 4D seismic.

Forms of emissions storage include:
Natural Gas Storage
Carbon Capture
Nuclear Remnants

The optimal seismic acquisition parameters will vary depending on your geological, economic, and geophysical objectives. Always make sure your seismic program is properly designed with your specific objectives in mind.
Talk to BJV the next time you are looking to acquire seismic for any form of emissions storage

08/25/2026

Did you know that seismic is often used for energy storage? Seismic is very valuable in determining economic and geological viability, as well as in identifying safe locations to store energy in the subsurface. Seismic is also an important element in the long term monitoring of subsurface reservoirs, often in the form of 4D seismic. Forms of energy storage include:
Natural Gas Storage
Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES)
Hydrogen Storage

The optimal seismic acquisition parameters will vary depending on your geological, economic, and geophysical objectives.

Always make sure your seismic program is properly designed with your specific objectives in mind.
Talk to BJV the next time you are looking to acquire seismic for any form of energy storage.

08/24/2026

Did you know that seismic is being used in the development of most forms of energy production including:
Geothermal
Hydrogen
Windfarm planning
Oil and Gas

The optimal seismic acquisition parameters will vary depending on your energy type, economic, and geophysical objectives
Always make sure your seismic program is properly designed with your specific objectives in mind.
Talk to us the next time you are looking to acquire seismic for any form of energy production

08/20/2026

When designing an orthogonal 3D seismic program, we must consider the orientation of the source lines and receiver lines. There are two main criteria to consider when deciding on how to orient the lines: the COST CRITERIA and the GEOPHYSICAL CRITERIA.

So what happens when the results of our two criteria are different?
How do we proceed:
We must evaluate the BUSINESS VALUE OF USING THE OPTIMAL GEOPHYSICAL LINE ORIENTATION vs THE COST INCREASE of not following the line orientation with optimal cost.

To answer this:
We need to determine if the data quality will be reduced enough to justify the additional costs associated with the geophysically optimum line orientation. If we can reduce our exploration risk factors significantly by spending additional capital on the optimal geophysical line orientation, we move forward with a more costly optimal geophysical line orientation.

08/19/2026

When designing an orthogonal 3D seismic program, we must consider the orientation of the source lines and receiver lines. There are two main criteria to consider when deciding how to orient the lines: the COST CRITERIA and the GEOPHYSICAL CRITERIA.
Today, we will focus on the GEOPHYSICAL CRITERIA:
The GEOPHYSICAL CRITERIA involves focusing on how orienting the lines will optimize the imaging capability of the 3D seismic survey. Traditionally, we like to orient the receiver lines in the direction of geological dip. This is done for multiple reasons, one being that we require finer sampling to properly image steeply dipping planes, another being that the dip direction can often be the direction highest structural variability, therefore requiring higher sampling. To truly determine the optimal line orientation of a 3D seismic program, you must have an idea of the geological complexity in not only the dip direction, but also the strike direction as sometimes the geological strike direction can be very complex.
If we dig into this further, we can start asking additional questions that may complicate what the optimal geophysical line orientation is. For example,
1. If our SI=RI, why can’t we have the source lines in the dip direction?
2. If we are acquiring a hi-resolution vibe survey where the SI

08/18/2026

When designing an orthogonal 3D seismic program, we must consider the orientation of the source lines and receiver lines. There are two main criteria to consider when orienting the lines: The COST CRITERIA and the GEOPHYSICAL CRITERIA.

Today, we will focus on the COST CRITERIA:
We know that seismic crews typically lay out complete receiver lines, and that the longer a receiver line, the more receivers will be required to lay it out. The more channels a seismic program requires, the larger the seismic crew needed to complete the project. In the end, all this means that to minimize recording crew costs, seismic programs should be laid out with the receiver lines with the shortest lines possible.
Now, there are many exceptions to this rule, so please feel free to comment below.

Watch for tomorrow's post on the GEOPHYSICAL CRITERIA to consider when deciding how to orient the source and receiver lines in a 3D seismic program.

Address

Calgary, AB
T3H4Z9

Telephone

+14038802347

Website

http://www.bjv-3ddesign.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when BJV Design Inc. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Want your business to be the top-listed Engineering Company in Calgary?