19/03/2026
Can farmers afford (NOT) to trial biological tools this season?
Nitrogen is becoming more expensive, more fragile, and more politically exposed. And this is no longer just a nitrogen story.
Synthetic phosphorus fertilisers are under pressure too, because phosphate supply depends heavily on sulphur and fragile global trade routes.
That means 2026 may be more than just another difficult input season.
It may be a real opportunity.
- Not to panic.
- Not to chase miracles.
- But to test practical options that could improve nutrient efficiency and reduce exposure to volatile inputs.
For me, that is the real conversation agriculture should be having right now.
The question is no longer only: "How do we cope with higher input risk?"
A better question may be: "What can we trial this season that may help the farm become more efficient and more resilient?"
That is where biological tools deserve serious attention. Not as a silver bullet. Not as a replacement for good agronomy. But as tools worth testing properly under real farm conditions.
Can they help:
- unlock more phosphorus already in the soil?
- improve nitrogen use efficiency?
- support crop response under stress?
- reduce dependence on the most volatile parts of the input programme?
That is exactly the kind of question a simple side-by-side farm trial can answer.
This is the message I really want to get out there: No farmer should get to next season and think, “We should have tested that last year! Why did nobody tell me about THIS opportunity?” That's why I'm writing this now.
So, can farmers afford NOT to trial biological tools this season?
This is not a message of fear.
It is a message of opportunity.
If you want to read the full article, here it is:
https://bactotech.co.uk/can-farmers-afford-not-to-trial-biological-tools/
Can farmers afford not to trial biological tools this season? With N and phosphorus under pressure, 2026 may be the right year to test.