09/06/2026
๐ฑ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐๐ข๐จ๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐. ๐๐ญ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐๐ค.
One of the most overlooked factors in biogas production is the impact of substrate selection on plant performance.
Easily degradable feedstocks such as food waste, dairy waste, and fruit & vegetable residues can accelerate microbial activity, resulting in faster hydrolysis and higher initial biogas production. However, relying solely on these substrates can sometimes challenge process stability.
On the other hand, lignocellulosic feedstocks such as crop residues, straw, and bagasse degrade more slowly due to their fibre and lignin content, often contributing to more stable and sustained gas production over time.
The question is not which feedstock is better.
The question is how to optimize feedstock strategy for long-term operational efficiency, methane productivity, and process stability.
As the biogas industry continues to scale, understanding feedstock characteristics will remain critical to building efficient, resilient, and commercially successful projects.
๐๐ง ๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐๐ค ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐ก๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐.
Utkarsh Gupta | Anil Kumar Tyagi | Anil Dhussa | Damini Bisht | Mehmet รnal | Devesh Garg | Asit Chatterjee | Aseem Mishra | Abhirup Bhattacharya