18/12/2022
Recently I attended a 2-day seminar on advanced features of structural analysis using ETABS. One of the topics touched on was using response spectrum for seismic analysis. It’s a simple process in Singapore, scaling the design response spectrum with the one and only value of peak ground acceleration, and program like ETABS will take care of the rest. I wonder what proportion of seismic engineers are versed in the bases of what the software is doing and therefore what limitations such an approximate analysis has. After all, the basis of modern seismic analysis is ductility, deformation beyond yield point, nonlinearity; but design offices mostly run elastic modal analyses on elastic response spectrum modified by behavior factor to account for reduced force demand due to ductility and force redistribution at plastic hinges. The codes therefore set conditions under which such an analysis can be used.