08/23/2024
GEOLOGIC MISINFORMATION ON THE INTERNET: THE FACEBOOK PROBLEM
“Stronger relationships with those you love, a stronger economy with more opportunities, and a stronger society that reflects all of our values " Facebook Says.
But it's seldom true
The internet could provide information & discussion of major critical scientific issues like climate change, sea level rise, age dating, conservation, etc. These are met by a tsunami of responses: 1. Acceptance of the post leading to discussion; 2. Polite criticism of the idea, allowing discussion; and 3. Nasty, mean, repulsive, even threatening, posts by trolls who wish to trash the original topic and author by name-calling, demands to leave the state or FB, reference to conspiracy websites for support, criticism of the author’s employer, and a multitude of other slanderous posts. Because of number 3, FB commonly deletes the entire thread of the discussion, thus anti-science & misinformation win.
We should deal with negative posts by replying with evidence or a question done politely and with grace. Insist that the posters present an alternative hypothesis that accounts for the evidence. You can’t win, but other readers may learn. Should your thread be taken down, object to the administrator of the FB page with a comment that the topic and its solutions are based on demonstrated scientific evidence, not personal opinion or politics. Suggest that the negative and nasty posts be deleted, thus eliminating objections to entire thread.
This is a continuing and developing problem influencing a large number of people. And AI will likely complicate these issues as it becomes more widely used.
And of course, this kind of stuff occurs in many science discussions on all internet--FB, Twitter sometimes referred to X, Instagram, etc.)
I will discuss the geologic issues at the upcoming Geological Society of America meeting on the afternoon of Sunday, September 22: