09/05/2026
Texas Senate Bill Three (SB3) calls for the installation and operation of sirens in a strategy to provide flash flood warning.
It’s not a new strategy but it is unproven. Despite over a century of municipal siren usage, we have found no record of a successful flash flood intervention event ever…anywhere.
This is not a criticism of the solution itself but recognition that it requires careful consideration as there is no established successful roadmap.
Given this approach, strict adherence to established acoustic warning standards is prudent.
FEMA’s Outdoor Siren Guide CPG 1-17 provides established guidance. It’s a 1981 reference but still checks out. We maintain this is last century’s technology and established physics doesn’t change with time. Let’s explore those standards.
“The most important factor that determines the detectability of a sound is the signal-to-noise ratio. The noise portion is the ratio of the background noise at the listener’s location.
Thus, for a given level of warning, the background noise is CRITICAL to determine warning signal effectiveness. (CPG -17).
This isn’t that complicated for the same reasons you may not hear your phone ringing at a rock concert as ambient noise is higher than your ringer.
Given that deference, what is the background noise level during an extreme mesoscale thunderstorm next to a raging river?
Without that number, we cannot begin to meet any standard in warning let alone publish a coverage map.
There are established acoustic engineering firms who design city wide mass warning systems who might have been commissioned to explore these issues.
Of the 36 project contributors on the 83-page Texas Water Development Board Siren Guide, we cannot find a single acoustic engineering resume or contributor.
This is difficult to explain considering the severity and recent loss of life.
To randomly install sirens along our riverbanks utilizing siren manufacturer sales brochures uncorrected for ambient is misfeasance and a serious deviation from established standards in acoustic warning.
Furthermore, having those solutions signed off by anyone but a credible acoustic engineer is highly problematic.
We foresee increased fatality risk and massive liability for our counties should they field these warning solutions without storm validation or worse, advertise coverage areas of warning protection that are not scientifically achievable.
Given this public health and safety issue, River Sentry is commissioning two out-of-state Acoustic Engineering firms to provide expert background noise validation.
Additionally, they will provide a corrected performance range for the current county siren solutions installed in proximity to ours in Kerr County.