08/05/2026
Lots of strong opinions on this one... what’s yours? 👇
1.5-Hour Practices
A shorter practice can allow teams to stay focused, maintain a higher level of intensity, and maximize quality repetitions. With less time available, coaches are often forced to create a clear plan and prioritize the most important skills and concepts. This can help athletes stay mentally engaged and reduce unnecessary fatigue throughout a long season.
The challenge is that 90 minutes can go quickly. Coaches may have less time to cover individual skill development, team systems, serve receive, defensive strategies, and competitive game situations while still allowing athletes enough repetitions to improve.
2-Hour Practices
A two-hour practice gives coaches additional time to teach, correct, and develop athletes. It allows more opportunities for skill progression, team strategy, competitive drills, and game preparation. The extra time can be valuable for teams that are building chemistry, installing new systems, or preparing for a demanding schedule.
The challenge is that longer practices require intentional planning. Maintaining the same level of energy, focus, and quality throughout two hours is critical. More time does not always mean better results if athletes become fatigued or repetitions lose intensity.
Ultimately, the most effective practice length is the one that allows coaches to maximize development, maintain athlete engagement, and create a positive environment where players continue to grow their skills and love for the game.
